Should Ultraprocessed Foods Be Off The Menu?

Key Takeaways Copied to clipboard!

• The new federal dietary guidelines explicitly call for limiting ultra-processed foods (UPFs), a first for the guidelines, though experts worry the emphasis on personal choice ignores the pervasive, cheap nature of UPFs in the food environment.  Copied to clipboard!
• The guidelines' promotion of protein from meat and dairy, as depicted in the inverted food pyramid, contradicts past scientific recommendations favoring seafood and plant-based proteins, suggesting industry influence on the final policy.  Copied to clipboard!
• Ultra-processed foods are intentionally designed to be 'optimally reinforcing' by manipulating sensory properties, and regulatory action is needed, drawing parallels from successful historical controls on tobacco and alcohol, rather than relying solely on individual consumer choice.  Copied to clipboard!

Segments Expand All Collapse All

Introduction to UPFs and Guidelines

Copied to clipboard!

(00:01:24)

• Key Takeaway: The USDA’s new dietary guidelines advise Americans to consume less ultra-processed foods (UPFs), which currently constitute nearly 60% of the average adult diet.
• Summary: Host Flora Lichtman introduces the topic of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) following the release of new federal dietary guidelines. These guidelines specifically recommend eating less of these highly processed foods. The segment sets the stage by noting the high prevalence of UPFs in the American diet and their presence in school lunch menus.

Critique of Dietary Guidelines

Copied to clipboard!

(00:02:48)

• Key Takeaway: Experts criticize the new dietary guidelines for focusing too heavily on individual recommendations while failing to address the systemic issue of the food environment, which heavily favors ultra-processed options.
• Summary: Dr. Laura Schmidt expresses concern that the guidelines function as personal health advice rather than addressing the overwhelming availability and low cost of UPFs in the food supply. Dr. Alyssa Moran notes that this is the first time UPFs have been explicitly called out, contrasting the US approach with countries like Brazil, which have warned against them for over a decade. Both experts highlight the challenge of avoiding UPFs when they dominate grocery store offerings and are often the cheapest option.

Controversy over Protein and Pyramid

Copied to clipboard!

(00:05:25)

• Key Takeaway: The new inverted food pyramid prominently features meat and steak at the top, prioritizing protein from meat and dairy, which conflicts with past guidelines favoring seafood and plant-based proteins.
• Summary: The discussion critiques the visual representation of the new guidelines, specifically the inverted food pyramid featuring large portions of steak and roast bird. Past guidelines, aligned with scientific evidence, recommended prioritizing seafood and plant-based proteins like nuts and legumes. Concerns are raised that the guidelines may be influenced by the meat and dairy industries, evidenced by the prominent placement of their products.

Guideline Formulation and Transparency

Copied to clipboard!

(00:06:40)

• Key Takeaway: The process for creating dietary guidelines is political, as the final federal agency recommendations often deviate from the scientific advisory committee’s report, with this cycle involving a new, un-commented-upon report from a committee showing financial ties to the meat and dairy industry.
• Summary: The guidelines are determined by a scientific advisory committee whose recommendations are not always precisely reflected in the final federal guidelines, indicating a political process. This cycle involved the appointment of a new committee whose report was not subject to public comment before influencing the final guidelines. This lack of transparency is concerning, especially given the financial conflicts of interest observed among committee members.

Impact of Guidelines on Federal Programs

Copied to clipboard!

(00:11:03)

• Key Takeaway: The dietary guidelines provide the legal foundation for federal food programs like the National School Lunch Program, meaning changes in the guidelines directly dictate the types of food purchased and served to students.
• Summary: The guidelines are crucial because they dictate how the federal government uses its massive buying power in programs like WIC and school lunches. Schools participating in the National School Lunch Program are legally required to adhere to these guidelines. Therefore, the guidelines influence whether schools subsidize unhealthy products or shift toward healthier options.

Defining Ultra-Processed Foods (NOVA)

Copied to clipboard!

(00:16:04)

• Key Takeaway: Ultra-processed foods are defined by the NOVA classification system based on the intent of processing—designing products to be ‘optimally reinforcing’ using additives, dyes, and texturizers to encourage overconsumption.
• Summary: The NOVA classification system, originating in Brazil, shifts the focus from individual nutrients to the degree of processing. UPFs are intentionally engineered by food companies to hijack the brain’s reward system, using ingredients like food dyes and texturizers to make them highly appealing. This engineering strategy was reportedly influenced by strategies developed when tobacco companies owned major US food corporations.

Regulatory Loopholes and Ingredient Safety

Copied to clipboard!

(00:21:08)

• Key Takeaway: US food companies are not legally required to notify the FDA or gain approval before adding new ingredients to the food supply, allowing them to easily reformulate products to skirt potential regulations.
• Summary: Industry efforts to label products as ’non-ultra processed’ are seen as a backlash against potential regulation targeting UPFs. A major regulatory hurdle is that the FDA lacks a complete list of all added ingredients because companies self-declare safety without providing proof or notification. The FDA has signaled a move toward ‘GRAS reform’ to require notification and post-market review for new ingredients.

Health Impacts and Mechanisms of UPFs

Copied to clipboard!

(00:26:03)

• Key Takeaway: Diets high in ultra-processed foods are associated with chronic diseases, obesity, and behaviors consistent with addiction, driven by a combination of hyperpalatability, chemical additives, and nutrient imbalance.
• Summary: Extensive literature links high UPF intake to cardiometabolic diseases, obesity, depression, and infertility across dozens of countries. Research also implicates these foods in addiction, as they cause overeating equivalent to an extra 500 calories per day in clinical trials. While mechanisms involve overeating, gut microbiome disruption, and direct chemical effects, regulatory action should not wait for perfect mechanistic understanding, as demonstrated by past regulation of tobacco and alcohol.

Policy Prescription for UPF Reduction

Copied to clipboard!

(00:30:41)

• Key Takeaway: Policymakers must implement regulatory actions, such as taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages similar to alcohol taxes, alongside investments to promote access to minimally processed foods, especially by increasing reimbursement rates for school meal programs.
• Summary: Experts argue that systemic policy change, not individual effort, is required to solve the UPF crisis, drawing a playbook from successful tobacco and alcohol control. Policy prescriptions include taxing unhealthy items like sugar-sweetened beverages to disincentivize consumption. Simultaneously, investment is needed to support alternatives, including higher reimbursement rates, better infrastructure, and training for school food service staff to affordably serve healthier, scratch-cooked meals.