Who Gets to Edit Culture? Sensitivity Readers & Censorship in Book Publishing

Key Takeaways Copied to clipboard!

• Literary study has shifted from appreciating aesthetic beauty and the human condition to a 'hermeneutics of critique' focused on unpacking and challenging oppressive ideologies, often informed by Marxism.  Copied to clipboard!
• The enforcement mechanism for expanded definitions of offensive content is social media, where a small number of highly credentialed actors can generate the perception of mass consensus, leading to book cancellations and the rise of sensitivity readers.  Copied to clipboard!
• Apologies in public controversies are often formulaic and counterproductive, as the apology itself frequently becomes the next target for criticism, leading to a cycle of escalating demands.  Copied to clipboard!
• The popularity of figures promoting perseverance and personal responsibility, like Jocko Willink, contrasts sharply with the depressing, victimhood-focused narratives found in some popular anti-racism literature, such as that by Ibram X. Kendi.  Copied to clipboard!
• Sensitivity reading, when applied to fiction, risks homogenizing marginalized groups by enforcing stereotypes (e.g., dictating what an African American family would or would not eat), mirroring the problematic essentialism seen in historical cultural documents.  Copied to clipboard!
• The current climate in publishing and academia incentivizes performative outrage and intolerance, where individuals are punished (losing jobs or contracts) for merely questioning the accepted narrative or advocating for open discussion, even among those who internally disagree with the prevailing ideology.  Copied to clipboard!

Segments Expand All Collapse All

Podcast Advertising Interruption

Copied to clipboard!

(00:00:00)

• Key Takeaway: Podcast advertising leverages the intimate companion status of audio content to capture listener attention effectively.
• Summary: Marketing is presented as difficult, but podcast advertising offers a direct route to engaged listeners. Services like LibSyn Ads allow advertisers to reach audiences through host endorsements or pre-produced ads across thousands of shows. This medium is effective because listeners often consume podcasts during focused activities like driving or working out.

HVAC and Plumbing Services Ad

Copied to clipboard!

(00:00:41)

• Key Takeaway: Yostin Campbell offers comprehensive home services including heating, cooling, generators, and plumbing, with financing options available.
• Summary: Yostin Campbell has provided heating and cooling expertise for over 85 years. They offer high-efficiency system upgrades starting at $149 per month, including repairs, maintenance, and filters. The company has recently expanded its services to include full plumbing solutions.

Literary Studies Shift

Copied to clipboard!

(00:01:12)

• Key Takeaway: The purpose of literature in academia has fundamentally shifted from aesthetic appreciation to a Marxist-informed ‘hermeneutics of critique’ focused on ideology.
• Summary: Historically, literature was taught to reveal the human condition and praise aesthetic beauty. Since the 1960s, the focus has moved to identifying and challenging oppressive ideologies (race, sex, capitalism) embedded in texts. This critical approach often supersedes discussions of a book’s inherent quality or aesthetic merit.

Audience Capture and Controversy

Copied to clipboard!

(00:02:11)

• Key Takeaway: Content creators are incentivized by algorithms to pursue extreme or controversial topics, like interviewing notorious figures, because such content drives higher engagement than measured critique.
• Summary: The ‘audience capture effect’ drives creators whose income relies on metrics like likes and retweets toward sensational content. Consciously or unconsciously, creators will produce more content that generates outrage or controversy. This dynamic is observed in figures who prioritize high engagement over nuanced policy discussion.

Book Cancellation and Sensitivity Readers

Copied to clipboard!

(00:02:30)

• Key Takeaway: Mainstream literary freedom is challenged by the use of change.org petitions and sensitivity readers to literally cancel books before or after publication.
• Summary: Controversies over the past decade have resulted in books being canceled before release or retracted post-publication, often under the guise of anti-racism or feminism. Sensitivity readers, originally used by Christian publishers, are now hired across fiction and nonfiction to vet material for potential offense. This environment makes literary freedom difficult to maintain at major publishing houses like Penguin Random House.

Guest Background and Critique

Copied to clipboard!

(00:03:10)

• Key Takeaway: Adam Szetela’s book critiques the direction of English departments and the machinery of book cancellation, leading to professional pushback from some academics.
• Summary: Adam Szetela, holding PhD credentials from Cornell, wrote That Book Is Dangerous! to analyze book cancellations and the evolution of literary studies. While some mentors were supportive, he notes that many in the English department strongly oppose his work because it critiques the field’s current trajectory. His work highlights the left’s tendency toward internal conflict (‘circular firing squad’) versus conservative unity.

Concept Creep and Social Media Enforcement

Copied to clipboard!

(00:11:14)

• Key Takeaway: The definitions of what constitutes a ‘racist’ or ‘sexist’ book have expanded to the point of being expansive and contradictory, enforced by social media mechanisms.
• Summary: The problem is not historical stereotypes in literature, but the ‘concept creep’ regarding what counts as offensive today. This expanded moral language is enforced by social media platforms (Twitter, Goodreads) and petitions, which compress timelines and collapse context. This system incentivizes publishers toward caution and self-censorship.

Sensitivity Reader Economics

Copied to clipboard!

(00:16:53)

• Key Takeaway: Sensitivity readers are economically incentivized to find fault in manuscripts, mirroring Upton Sinclair’s observation that income often depends on not being convinced otherwise.
• Summary: If a reader is paid to find insensitive material, they are likely to find something, forcing meaning toward the safest ideological interpretation. Furthermore, sensitivity readers often participate in the ‘mob’ attacking books, creating a conflict of interest where controversy benefits those centered within it, similar to an arsonist selling fire insurance.

Outrage vs. Actual Opinion

Copied to clipboard!

(00:14:00)

• Key Takeaway: Controversies driven by social media represent a small, highly motivated percentage of readers, whose outrage is disproportionate to the general public’s lukewarm reception of the criticized work.
• Summary: Despite intense online backlash against books like American Dirt, general consumer ratings (e.g., on Amazon) often remain high, indicating that the vocal minority does not reflect mass opinion. These online mobs are often led by figures with status credentials, such as established authors or professors, whose tweets generate significant publisher attention.

The Silencing Effect of Outrage

Copied to clipboard!

(00:18:59)

• Key Takeaway: Even if the vocal minority is small, the visible aggression of online outrage creates a powerful silencing effect on the majority who fear being targeted.
• Summary: The constant visibility of campus craziness or online attacks leads many reasonable individuals, including established scientists, to self-censor and ‘keep their head down.’ This fear of cancellation prevents many from speaking out, even when they disagree with the prevailing orthodoxies in their fields.

Motives in Corporate Wokeness

Copied to clipboard!

(00:25:47)

• Key Takeaway: Corporate decisions regarding social messaging are driven by a mix of true belief among those in PR/arts positions and cynical economic calculation by others.
• Summary: True believers, often educated at elite universities, occupy powerful positions in media and publishing, genuinely believing in the social justice mission. However, others may engage in virtue signaling (like adding pronouns to email signatures) as a low-cost way to feel helpful when unable to influence major political outcomes.

Political Repressive Desublimation

Copied to clipboard!

(00:28:43)

• Key Takeaway: When the political right gains institutional power, the left channels its frustration into cultural battles over language and books because they cannot affect the political structures.
• Summary: The rise of right-wing political power (e.g., Republican control of Congress and the Supreme Court) correlates with increased left-wing cultural warfare. Unable to change major policy outcomes, activists funnel energy into cultural arenas like book shelves, driven by the academic belief that culture and language strongly influence real-world outcomes.

Apology Backfire and Militant Fragility

Copied to clipboard!

(00:33:48)

• Key Takeaway: Issuing apologies when one has not committed a genuine wrong only invites further criticism, illustrating a phenomenon of ‘militant fragility’ where hypersensitivity meets confrontation.
• Summary: Formulaic apologies, often demanded by the mob, are insufficient because the accusers’ narrative requires the target to admit to violence or racism, not just offense. When apologies are deemed insufficient, the individual is attacked further, as seen in cases where authors lost agents over their initial apologies. Militant fragility combines extreme emotional vulnerability with aggressive, confrontational tactics to enforce compliance.

Ignoring Mobs vs. Engaging Them

Copied to clipboard!

(00:39:37)

• Key Takeaway: Mobs driven by low attention spans often dissipate quickly if institutions or individuals refuse to engage or apologize, as demonstrated by Trader Joe’s response to criticism.
• Summary: When institutions like Trader Joe’s refused to change product labeling despite social media backlash, the controversy quickly became a non-event. University presidents who firmly reject demands, rather than capitulating, have also seen protests cease rapidly because the activists are not invested in long-term political struggle.

McWhorter on White Saviorism

Copied to clipboard!

(00:41:21)

• Key Takeaway: John McWhorter argues that white people positioning themselves as saviors of minority groups risks portraying those groups as weak, self-indulgent, and intellectually inferior.
• Summary: McWhorter critiques the dynamic where white individuals attempt to police language on behalf of people of color, suggesting this behavior undermines the perceived strength and capability of those groups. This dynamic was illustrated when a white student criticized a professor for calling a Black writer’s essay ‘ambitious,’ implying the writer could not handle such complexity.

NYT Skit on Cancel Culture

Copied to clipboard!

(00:44:05)

• Key Takeaway: A New York Times short satirized modern cancellation by depicting a medieval trial where due process is rejected in favor of immediate, anger-driven judgment.
• Summary: The skit highlighted that modern cancellation rejects trials and due process, asserting that the crowd’s anger qualifies them as judge and jury. The victim’s non-apology (‘I’m sorry you were offended’) was deemed worse than silence, showing the impossibility of satisfying the mob’s demands.

Political Polarization and Authenticity

Copied to clipboard!

(00:50:13)

• Key Takeaway: The political right maintains unity by prioritizing electoral victory over personal grievances, while the left often fractures over ideological purity tests, exemplified by figures like Ted Cruz supporting Trump.
• Summary: Republicans successfully unite disparate factions under a big-tent umbrella focused on winning elections, even when leaders insult each other. Conversely, the left frequently alienates potential voters by prioritizing ideological adherence, such as rejecting a candidate over a minor past statement. This lack of pragmatic unity contrasts sharply with the right’s focus on core objectives.

Masculinity, Peterson, and Authenticity

Copied to clipboard!

(00:54:29)

• Key Takeaway: The appeal of figures like Jordan Peterson lies in his promotion of basic self-help principles—getting a job, setting goals—which are now framed as radical right-wing conservatism.
• Summary: Peterson’s success stems from offering fundamental life advice, such as ‘Clean Your Room,’ that resonates with young men feeling lost. This basic self-improvement contrasts with the left’s perceived inauthenticity, such as politicians like Gavin Newsom attempting to mimic transgressive masculinity without genuine grounding. Authenticity in standing by one’s values, even under backlash, is highly valued by this demographic.

Jocko Wilnick and Grit

Copied to clipboard!

(01:01:02)

• Key Takeaway: The ‘Good’ mantra from Jocko Willink promotes basic perseverance and goal orientation, which some younger audiences misinterpret as ’toxic masculinity.’
• Summary: Jocko Willink’s philosophy, encapsulated by saying ‘Good’ when facing setbacks, encourages students to persevere and keep setting goals. The core message is simple discipline: if you fail, get back up and keep going. This contrasts with modern critiques labeling such advice as toxic masculinity.

Critique of Victimhood Culture

Copied to clipboard!

(01:03:20)

• Key Takeaway: Narratives emphasizing systemic oppression, like those by Ibram X. Kendi, are inherently depressing and ironically promote a lack of personal agency while often being authored by highly successful individuals.
• Summary: The message that success is impossible due to systemic racism is deeply depressing for listeners seeking agency. Authors promoting this view, like Ibram X. Kendi, have built highly profitable careers based on these narratives, often charging high fees for speaking engagements. This creates an irony where those claiming systemic barriers profit immensely from preaching about those barriers.

Stereotyping via Sensitivity Readers

Copied to clipboard!

(01:07:10)

• Key Takeaway: The requirement for sensitivity readers based solely on shared identity homogenizes diverse groups and often results in the recreation of simplistic, harmful stereotypes in published work.
• Summary: When a white author uses a Black sensitivity reader, the feedback often dictates what a Black person ‘would never’ say or eat, homogenizing millions of individuals. This process can lead to replacing nuanced characterization with clichés, such as insisting an African American family must eat collard greens instead of ramen noodles.

Countering Wokeness: Ideas vs. Law

Copied to clipboard!

(01:08:15)

• Key Takeaway: While academics favor fighting ideological battles through rational debate, political actors like Chris Rufo argue that substantive change against institutionalized ‘wokeness’ requires top-down legal intervention, as seen in Florida.
• Summary: Appeals to reason and open letters from dissident academics have shown limited success in reversing institutional changes like mandatory diversity statements. Conversely, threats of defunding by political figures like Donald Trump led to tangible institutional rollbacks at universities like Cornell and Harvard. This suggests that legal or financial leverage is often more effective than purely intellectual persuasion in this context.

Defining and Identifying Moral Panics

Copied to clipboard!

(01:10:40)

• Key Takeaway: A moral panic involves a disproportionate societal response to a perceived threat, where the call for censorship (like banning books) crosses the line from critical debate to treating ideas as taboo goods equivalent to firearms.
• Summary: Sociologists define a moral panic as an overreaction to a perceived threat, exemplified by historical fears over rock and roll or contemporary concerns over specific books. A proportionate response involves critical essay writing or debate, whereas a panic manifests as demands to remove content from platforms entirely, such as petitioning Amazon to classify a book like a gun.

Free Speech and Hypocrisy

Copied to clipboard!

(01:14:22)

• Key Takeaway: Few people are truly committed to free speech, as evidenced by the swift shift in tolerance when controversial speech—whether from Holocaust deniers or concerning trans athletes—triggers personal offense.
• Summary: The willingness to defend free speech often collapses when confronted with ideas that cause personal offense, leading to calls for censorship or professional ruin. The speaker notes that defending the right of controversial figures like Ernst Zundel to speak often backfires by inadvertently promoting them, illustrating the difficulty in separating the principle of free expression from the content being expressed.

Gender Identity and Racial Identity

Copied to clipboard!

(01:26:36)

• Key Takeaway: The differential acceptance of identifying as a different gender versus identifying as a different race highlights an inconsistency in how social constructs are currently prioritized and policed.
• Summary: The question was posed regarding the asymmetry in accepting self-identification: why is it permissible for a person to identify as a woman, but not for a white person to identify as Black, as exemplified by the Rachel Dolezal controversy? The ensuing debate involved critiques suggesting that race, unlike gender, is not viewed as a purely mutable social construct by certain ideological factions.

Punitive Cancel Culture

Copied to clipboard!

(01:30:23)

• Key Takeaway: The punitive nature of modern cancellation often involves destroying an individual’s livelihood (‘means of production’) while the perpetrators simultaneously advocate for social safety nets like universal healthcare.
• Summary: The consequence for expressing dissenting views, even in fiction, can be the complete destruction of a person’s career, agent, and financial stability. This punitive action is often carried out by individuals who simultaneously preach Marxist concepts of protecting the means of production and advocate for universal economic support.

Pessimism for Publishing’s Future

Copied to clipboard!

(01:32:14)

• Key Takeaway: The publishing industry is unlikely to self-correct toward the center because the institutionalized mechanisms of risk management, such as sensitivity reading, are permanent features designed to avoid social media backlash.
• Summary: The speaker is not optimistic about mainstream publishing returning to a neutral center, viewing it as analogous to mainstream academia. Institutionalized practices, like retaining sensitivity readers, will not disappear because publishers fear being ’tweeted at’ by those very readers if they stop. This results in ongoing pressure to sanitize fictional content, even historical dialogue, to avoid controversy.