The Rewatchables

‘Shampoo’ With Bill Simmons, Cameron Crowe, and Sean Fennessey

December 9, 2025

Key Takeaways Copied to clipboard!

  • Cameron Crowe chose the 1975 film 'Shampoo' for 'The Rewatchables' because it spoke to the era he felt the country was in, praising its music, character interconnections, and representation of a new generation of filmmakers. 
  • The discussion highlights that 'Shampoo' is a multi-layered film that evolves in perception, moving from a surface-level sex comedy to a profound commentary on the late 1960s, political dishonesty (Nixon's re-election), and the theme of selling out. 
  • Warren Beatty's performance in 'Shampoo' is characterized as a 'quietly Bravura' showcase where the line between the actor's real-life persona as a womanizer and the character of George is intentionally blurred, a quality that made him a defining star of the 1970s. 
  • The era of filmmaking around 1970 was characterized by a unique, competitive camaraderie among great directors that spurred innovation, particularly in the use of modern music via needle drops. 
  • Roger Ebert's initial lukewarm review of ‘Shampoo’ (2.5 stars) focused on the film's sexual gymnastics serving as symptoms of George's emotional blockage, a reading the hosts found insightful. 
  • The discussion highlighted that the 1968 setting of ‘Shampoo’ often felt more like a stylized, idealized mid-70s Los Angeles than the actual late-60s era it depicted, particularly regarding the party scenes and LA's sprawl. 
  • The discussion highlighted several continuity errors in ‘Shampoo’, most notably the unexplained reappearance of Warren Beatty's character's Triumph motorcycle at the final party. 
  • The participants debated the ambiguous fate of several characters, including whether Jill slept with Johnny Pope and whether George ever successfully opened his salon. 
  • The conversation concluded by praising ‘Shampoo’ for successfully blending social commentary with entertainment, noting that Jill represents a hopeful, independent path out of the era's 'sellout' generation. 

Segments

Guest Introduction and Almost Famous
Copied to clipboard!
(00:00:50)
  • Key Takeaway: Cameron Crowe’s film ‘Almost Famous’ is the most frequently requested but unreleased episode for ‘The Rewatchables’ Pantheon.
  • Summary: Cameron Crowe is introduced as a guest on ‘The Rewatchables’ for the first time. Bill Simmons notes that Crowe’s film ‘Almost Famous’ is the most requested movie for the show that has not yet been covered. Crowe also has a new book titled ‘The Uncool’ being promoted.
Why Crowe Picked Shampoo
Copied to clipboard!
(00:02:34)
  • Key Takeaway: ‘Shampoo’ (1975) resonated with Crowe because it spoke to the era, featured great music, and showcased a new generation of filmmakers like Hal Ashby.
  • Summary: Crowe selected ‘Shampoo’ because he was drawn to movies reflecting the current era, appreciating Mike Nichols’ prior work and seeing ‘Shampoo’ as a breakthrough for filmmakers he admired. He specifically praises the music and the interconnection between the characters. Crowe was 18 when the film was released.
Shampoo’s Iconic Status and Ashby’s Run
Copied to clipboard!
(00:03:17)
  • Key Takeaway: Warren Beatty’s role as a womanizing hairdresser in ‘Shampoo’ was iconic, perfectly handled by screenwriter Robert Towne, and followed a strong run by director Hal Ashby.
  • Summary: The film was iconic because Warren Beatty played a hairdresser using his profession to sleep with women, leading to complications expertly handled by Robert Towne. This film marked the third in a powerful run for director Hal Ashby, following ‘Harold and Maude’ and ‘The Last Detail’.
Sean Fennessey’s Relationship with Shampoo
Copied to clipboard!
(00:04:10)
  • Key Takeaway: ‘Shampoo’ is considered a major signpost in film education due to its success as a popcorn movie that is simultaneously politically, sexually, and socially relevant.
  • Summary: Fennessey, having not seen the film upon release, views it as essential viewing from the 1970s American filmmaking period, citing Ashby and Towne’s strong creative output. He notes the film is highly watchable and funny, avoiding the trap of being difficult homework despite its relevance. The movie features a major star actively riffing on his public persona.
Evolving Perceptions of Shampoo
Copied to clipboard!
(00:05:21)
  • Key Takeaway: The understanding of ‘Shampoo’ shifts dramatically across life stages, moving from focusing on sex and nudity in youth to appreciating its subtle political and social layers later in life.
  • Summary: As a teenager, the film was primarily about attractive women and potential nudity, but college viewing revealed interesting filmmaking choices. By the 50s, the film is recognized not as a sex comedy, but as a subtle observation of the late 1960s, with politics and social change operating stealthily beneath the surface.
Political Subtlety and Selling Out Theme
Copied to clipboard!
(00:06:07)
  • Key Takeaway: The film masterfully integrates political context, like Nixon’s re-election, without dogma, focusing instead on the characters’ personal struggles and the central theme of selling out.
  • Summary: The movie subtly incorporates politics, showing Nixon in scenes without hitting the audience over the head with the changing generation. The core theme is identified as ‘selling out,’ where characters prioritize comfort and personal life over civic participation or ideals. Goldie Hawn’s character, Jill, is highlighted as the only non-cynic who opts out of this cycle.
Beatty’s Performance Persona
Copied to clipboard!
(00:08:20)
  • Key Takeaway: Warren Beatty’s performance is inseparable from his real-life persona, characterized by a handsome but slightly bewildered, disheveled charm that women found irresistible.
  • Summary: The discussion questions whether Beatty’s performance is truly acting or simply his persona bleeding through, noting he rarely differs significantly from characters like George in ‘Shampoo’ or Joe Pendleton in ‘Heaven Can Wait.’ His physical presence and undeniable attractiveness are cited as key components of why his character succeeds with every woman.
Joni Mitchell’s Rejected Song
Copied to clipboard!
(00:11:59)
  • Key Takeaway: Warren Beatty rejected a deeply insightful song written by Joni Mitchell, ‘Sweet Bird,’ because it exposed the insecurity beneath his character’s persona, preferring the less revealing score by Paul Simon.
  • Summary: Beatty sought a song from Joni Mitchell, who wrote ‘Sweet Bird’ referencing his persona and films like ‘Splendor in the Grass.’ Beatty rejected it because the song revealed the insecurity beneath the facade, opting instead for the more ambiguous score that plays throughout the movie. This mirrors the rumor that Carly Simon’s ‘You’re So Vain’ was also about him.
Shampoo as End of Free Love Era
Copied to clipboard!
(00:13:50)
  • Key Takeaway: While critics read ‘Shampoo’ as the end of the free love era, Warren Beatty himself viewed the film as a statement on the dishonesty in American governance following Vietnam and Watergate.
  • Summary: The film is often interpreted as marking the end of the free love era, but Beatty believed it reflected the generation’s frustration with dishonesty from leaders. Beatty’s character, George, is seen as still living in the free love era while the world around him changes, making him an empathetic but flawed figure.
Goldie Hawn’s Character as Truth Teller
Copied to clipboard!
(00:15:17)
  • Key Takeaway: Goldie Hawn’s character, Jill, is the only non-cynic who ultimately opts out of the cycle of selling out and serves as the only truth-telling character to George.
  • Summary: Jill is praised for heroically opting out of the compromises made by other characters, making her the favorite character for Crowe even though George doesn’t fully commit to her. She is the only one who tells George he is a phony and needs to be true to himself, a truth he rejects.
DNA Link to Almost Famous
Copied to clipboard!
(00:17:01)
  • Key Takeaway: Cameron Crowe recognized that Goldie Hawn’s realization scene in ‘Shampoo’ directly influenced the structure of a similar moment for Kate Hudson’s character in ‘Almost Famous.’
  • Summary: Crowe notes the DNA connection between the films, specifically citing Goldie Hawn’s realization cycle upon discovering George’s infidelity as a template for Kate Hudson’s character in ‘Almost Famous.’ Ashby’s choice to linger on Hawn’s reaction allowed her to patent that moment of realization for future use.
Beatty’s Screen Persona vs. Documentary Self
Copied to clipboard!
(00:19:05)
  • Key Takeaway: Warren Beatty’s on-screen persona, often that of a bumbling but charming figure, is closely aligned with his real-life reputation as an enigmatic, influential figure who rarely took conventional risks.
  • Summary: The discussion contrasts Beatty’s film choices, noting he turned down major roles like Michael Corleone and Gordon Gekko, suggesting a reluctance to take risks outside his established persona. His appearance in the ‘Truth or Dare’ documentary further blurred the lines between his acting roles and his actual behavior.
Beatty’s Best Performance
Copied to clipboard!
(00:21:06)
  • Key Takeaway: Both Simmons and Fennessey ultimately select ‘Shampoo’ as Beatty’s best performance because no other actor could inhabit that specific, central role.
  • Summary: While Simmons suggests ‘Reds’ is Beatty’s best acting, he prefers watching ‘Shampoo,’ and Fennessey agrees, stating no one else could play the part. Beatty is credited with running the movie as an actor, producer, and conceiver, making his presence indispensable.
Ashby’s Calm Amidst Conflict
Copied to clipboard!
(00:21:22)
  • Key Takeaway: The production of ‘Shampoo’ involved significant conflict between Warren Beatty and Robert Towne, but director Hal Ashby remained calm, trusting his mastery in the editing room to resolve the issues.
  • Summary: Reports suggest Beatty and Towne fought during production, leading to a tense set, though Crowe notes he is a collaborative person. Ashby’s reputation was that of a master editor who was unconcerned on set, believing the final product would be successful due to the genius of the assembled talent.
Making Realistic Period Films
Copied to clipboard!
(00:24:29)
  • Key Takeaway: Achieving realism in contemporary or recent-history films like ‘Shampoo’ and ‘Jerry Maguire’ requires meticulous attention to small, accurate details in the environment.
  • Summary: Creating a world that feels real, like the 1968 Beverly Hills in ‘Shampoo,’ is difficult but achieved by getting the small details right, such as cocktail napkin colors. Crowe shares an anecdote about having to reshoot a crowd scene in ‘Almost Famous’ because extras were using the wrong hand gestures for the time period.
Julie Christie’s Impact and Career Choices
Copied to clipboard!
(00:35:04)
  • Key Takeaway: Julie Christie was a perfect, frank, and intellectual counterpoint to Beatty’s energy, though she famously turned down major roles like those in ‘Reds’ and ‘The Verdict.’
  • Summary: Christie and Beatty had a long relationship, making three films together, and she provided a strong, direct contrast to Beatty’s more ambiguous energy. Producer Craig Horlbeck praised her as a magnificent woman combining intellect and sex appeal, noting her absence in modern cinema.
The 1975 Best Picture Lineup
Copied to clipboard!
(00:52:41)
  • Key Takeaway: The 1975 Best Picture nominees—‘One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest,’ ‘Barry Lyndon,’ ‘Dog Day Afternoon,’ ‘Jaws,’ and ‘Nashville’—represent one of the strongest lineups in Oscar history.
  • Summary: ‘Shampoo’ received four Oscar nominations (including Lee Grant winning Best Supporting Actress and Towne for Screenplay) but was shut out of Best Picture by an exceptionally strong field. The presence of so many great filmmakers in that single year suggests they spurred each other toward greater greatness.
Filmmaking Camaraderie and Eras
Copied to clipboard!
(00:52:44)
  • Key Takeaway: Filmmaking eras featuring many great directors spur each other on, similar to musical eras, leading to heightened collective greatness.
  • Summary: The presence of numerous talented filmmakers simultaneously encourages peer competition, pushing artists to summon their own greatness. Billy Wilder noted a greater camaraderie in that time that later splintered away. This confluence of evolving techniques and top talent in one decade is unlikely to be repeated.
Roger Ebert’s ‘Shampoo’ Review
Copied to clipboard!
(00:55:36)
  • Key Takeaway: Roger Ebert gave ‘Shampoo’ 2.5 stars, finding its ambitious conception ultimately failed due to unconfident timing, though he praised the reading of George’s dilemma.
  • Summary: Ebert felt the movie didn’t quite work despite gifted talent and deafening critical praise. He noted the sex scenes were directed as symptoms of George’s dilemma: being loving but too blocked for real relationships. The film requires multiple viewings to fully solve its complexities.
Jerry Maguire Prop Introduction
Copied to clipboard!
(00:56:50)
  • Key Takeaway: Cameron Crowe brought a promotional poster of Jerry O’Connell’s character, Cush, from ‘Jerry Maguire’ as a set piece.
  • Summary: The poster is identified as one of three existing Cush promo posters, referencing the character’s brief but memorable appearance. The poster features a slight paisley backing and undershirt texture, suggesting a specific moment in the film’s hotel room scenes. The hosts joke about finding the perfect place for the memorabilia without upsetting other movie artifacts.
Most Rewatchable Scene Nominees
Copied to clipboard!
(00:58:44)
  • Key Takeaway: The stare-down between Felicia (Goldie Hawn) and Jackie (Julie Christie) at the party was nominated for its intense, sustained gaze.
  • Summary: Multiple scenes were nominated, including Jill realizing George won’t sleep with her, George’s chaotic hair salon outburst, and the parking lot exchange where George states he doesn’t ‘fuck anyone for money.’ The scene where George confesses to Joe about sleeping with many women is also highlighted.
Cameron Crowe’s Top Scene Choice
Copied to clipboard!
(01:01:22)
  • Key Takeaway: Cameron Crowe selected the Bistro scene as the most rewatchable for its structural importance in orchestrating the interlocking relationships and capturing Jack Warden’s pain.
  • Summary: Crowe chose the Bistro scene over the Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds party sequence because it draws the viewer into the film’s layered complexity. This scene features Beatty brilliantly cutting through Jackie’s drunken monologue by simply stating, ‘You’re drunk.’
Sean Fennessey’s Top Scene Choice
Copied to clipboard!
(01:02:26)
  • Key Takeaway: Fennessey chose the final scene between George and Lester (Jack Warden) for encapsulating the film’s thesis on male camaraderie and the secondary role of women.
  • Summary: This scene reveals the instant camaraderie between George and Lester based on mutual cynicism about women, whom they view as props or means to an end. Lester’s focus on the dirty glasses highlights a specific, amusing character trait. The dialogue reveals what the men truly think about the women in their lives.
Most 1975 Element
Copied to clipboard!
(01:04:19)
  • Key Takeaway: Riding a motorcycle without a helmet was cited as the most noticeable 1975 element, symbolizing a happier, less regulated time.
  • Summary: Nominees for the most 1975 element included Warren Beatty’s hair and the use of the word ‘groovy.’ The sprawling, traffic-free depiction of Los Angeles also contributed to the era’s feel. The motorcycle riding without a helmet suggests a time when safety regulations were less strictly enforced.
Unanswered Questions and LA Setting
Copied to clipboard!
(01:06:05)
  • Key Takeaway: The party scenes raise unanswered questions about the ownership of the large estate hosting the counterculture gathering on election night.
  • Summary: The hosts questioned the identity of the house where the large, groovy party takes place, noting the extras looked less like authentic 1968 counterculture figures and more like a generalized satire. The LA depicted feels like a sunny paradise, contrasting with the smoggy reality suggested by later shots.
Unbelievable Film Shoot Anecdote
Copied to clipboard!
(01:11:25)
  • Key Takeaway: Lee Grant walked off the set for two days during a conflict with the director over her character’s motivation, returning only after Warren Beatty apologized.
  • Summary: The anecdote concerns a scene where Lee Grant disagreed with the direction regarding her character’s motivations following an implied sexual encounter involving her daughter. She left for two days until Beatty conceded, saying, ‘What do I know? I’m only a guy.’
What Aged Best: Cinematography and Kisses
Copied to clipboard!
(01:16:32)
  • Key Takeaway: The cinematography by Laszlo Kobaks and Warren Beatty’s mastery of building desire before a screen kiss are elements that have aged exceptionally well.
  • Summary: Crowe noted that Kobaks, who also shot ‘Say Anything’, beautifully captured textures and emotion, making every kiss matter. Beatty’s secret is focusing on the moment before the kiss, where the decision to change everything is made. This technique was intentionally milked in ‘Jerry Maguire’ as well.
What Aged Best: Hairdressers as Podcasters
Copied to clipboard!
(01:13:33)
  • Key Takeaway: The cultural role of the hairdresser as an intimate confidant, similar to a modern podcaster, is a theme that has faded since the film’s era.
  • Summary: The film smartly uses Carrie Fisher’s character, whose mother Debbie Reynolds represented an older Hollywood, to explore the power of hairdressers in Hollywood. These stylists held intimate knowledge of powerful people, acting as conduits for secrets, a role less culturally significant today.
What Aged Best: Warren Beatty’s Career Peak
Copied to clipboard!
(01:33:18)
  • Key Takeaway: The success of ‘Shampoo’ marked Warren Beatty’s Apex Mountain, giving him the creative control to pursue projects like ‘Reds’ afterward.
  • Summary: Beatty owned a significant backend stake in the film, and its success allowed him to do whatever he wanted next, setting up his later directorial efforts. This peak is arguably higher than his standing after ‘Heaven Can Wait’ because of the raw cultural immersion seen in ‘Shampoo’.
What Aged Worst: Paul Simon Soundtrack
Copied to clipboard!
(01:26:16)
  • Key Takeaway: The Paul Simon soundtrack, featuring two Beatles songs, is considered corny and weird, with one song being a rejected title track.
  • Summary: Paul Simon wrote a title song called ‘Have a Good Time’ that Warren Beatty rejected, leading Simon to place it on his album ‘Still Crazy After All These Years’. The soundtrack also notably includes Jimi Hendrix’s ‘Manic Depression’ and Jefferson Airplane songs.
Overacting and Unconvincing Cries
Copied to clipboard!
(01:28:21)
  • Key Takeaway: Warren Beatty’s crying scene during the breakup at the end felt like a ‘fake true crime cry,’ suggesting he was dialing up the emotion too much.
  • Summary: Beatty’s performance in the final breakup scene was criticized for being slightly out of his comfort zone, characterized by excessive use of the word ‘honey.’ Jay Robinson’s performance as Norman was also noted for being slightly pushed, though his ’nickel and dime’ line was praised.
Hottest Take: Goldie Hawn’s Era
Copied to clipboard!
(01:30:03)
  • Key Takeaway: Goldie Hawn in the mid-70s was the single most adorable actress, missing out on the subsequent rom-com boom that Meg Ryan dominated.
  • Summary: Hawn’s adorableness was distinct from being prettiest or sexiest, making every male co-star likely to have a crush on her. She missed the rom-com explosion starting with ‘When Harry Met Sally’ (1989), where she could have taken every part from Meg Ryan for a decade.
Casting: Philip Seymour Hoffman as Lester
Copied to clipboard!
(01:37:56)
  • Key Takeaway: Philip Seymour Hoffman was the perfect actor for the role of Lester Bangs in ‘Almost Famous’, embodying the character’s corrosive energy even while battling the flu.
  • Summary: Hoffman was so dialed in that he rehearsed all his scenes in 45 minutes, despite promising two weeks. His physical sickness during filming added a corrosive quality that perfectly suited the character’s beaten-down nature. He redefined the victory scene for the ‘uncool’ characters.
Picanettes: Unresolved Ambiguities
Copied to clipboard!
(01:42:48)
  • Key Takeaway: The film leaves ambiguous whether Jill slept with Johnny Pope at the party and how George planned to secure a bank loan for his salon.
  • Summary: The ambiguity surrounding Jill’s encounter with Johnny Pope leaves open questions about her agency versus manipulation. Furthermore, the practical logistics of a hairdresser securing a business loan in 1968 without a clear plan for client retention remain unexplained.
Party Location Confusion
Copied to clipboard!
(01:42:56)
  • Key Takeaway: A specific plot point regarding the party location and Lester’s reaction caused confusion for one participant.
  • Summary: One listener was confused about whose house the party was at and why Lester was upset to go there if it was supposed to be his house. This confusion related to the narrative flow of the party scenes. The specific detail rubbed one participant the wrong way.
Ambiguity of Jill’s Actions
Copied to clipboard!
(01:43:18)
  • Key Takeaway: The film intentionally leaves ambiguous whether Jill slept with Johnny Pope on the night of the party, contrasting Beatty’s accusation with her actions.
  • Summary: The ambiguity centers on whether Jill slept with Johnny Pope to secure a part, or if she possesses more personal agency. Beatty hints at the encounter, but the film never confirms it, showing only that she refuses him entry to the house later. This leaves the audience questioning her motivations.
Hairdresser Loan Process Inquiry
Copied to clipboard!
(01:43:55)
  • Key Takeaway: The practical process for a hairdresser to secure a $10,000 loan for a salon in 1968 is questioned as being highly unrealistic within the film’s plot.
  • Summary: The participants questioned how George would secure a loan for a salon in 1968, suggesting a bank would not approve it based on his ‘just trust me, bro’ approach. The low ask of $10,000 made Lester question if George was a fraud. It was suggested an independent investor would be more likely than a bank.
Motorcycle Continuity Error
Copied to clipboard!
(01:45:08)
  • Key Takeaway: A major continuity error exists where Warren Beatty’s character leaves the final party on his Triumph motorcycle, despite arriving in a car with Julie Christie.
  • Summary: The motorcycle was not present when the character arrived at the last party with Julie Christie, yet he departs on it. This logistical impossibility led one participant to jokingly suggest deleting the episode. The error was deemed the ‘biggest one’ found during nitpicking.
Jerry Maguire Nitpick
Copied to clipboard!
(01:45:33)
  • Key Takeaway: The Denver Broncos trading up for Frank Cushman in 1996 is questioned given they already had John Elway on the roster.
  • Summary: Cameron Crowe was asked to address a nitpick from ‘Jerry Maguire’ regarding the logic of the Denver Broncos’ draft strategy. The logic of acquiring another quarterback when John Elway was still active was deemed questionable. The hosts joked it must have been set in a parallel universe.
Dorothy’s Risky Career Move
Copied to clipboard!
(01:46:06)
  • Key Takeaway: Dorothy quitting her job to follow Jerry Maguire, despite having a young child and health benefits, mirrors the film’s theme of unexpected support.
  • Summary: The riskiness of Dorothy quitting her job, especially with a young child, was noted as a significant factor. This action aligns with the movie’s theme that the people you don’t expect to show up are the ones who support you. The hosts contrasted this with the silence from expected allies like Warren Beatty’s character.
Monday Night Football Time Travel
Copied to clipboard!
(01:47:07)
  • Key Takeaway: The timeline required for Jerry Maguire to travel from a Monday Night Football game in the East to the divorced women’s support group in Los Angeles is highly compressed and relies on significant time jumps.
  • Summary: The segment calculated the tight schedule: the game ending around (10:30) PM Eastern, followed by airport time (pre-9/11), landing in LAX around (11:30) PM Pacific time. This implies the support group meeting was still ongoing past (1:00) AM, requiring the audience to accept this temporal leap.
Oscar Worthy Performances
Copied to clipboard!
(01:48:19)
  • Key Takeaway: Lee Grant’s Oscar-winning performance for Best Supporting Actress is cited as the film’s most deserving award recognition.
  • Summary: The participants debated which single Oscar the film deserved, mentioning the Indian chant actor and the reaction of a woman next to Jackie during a sensitive conversation. Ultimately, Lee Grant’s actual Oscar win for her role was acknowledged as the definitive answer.
Character Fates Speculation
Copied to clipboard!
(01:48:53)
  • Key Takeaway: The consensus is that Lester and Jackie did not make it as a couple, and George likely failed to run his salon due to being too much of a ‘flake.’
  • Summary: The group agreed that Lester and Jackie broke up, with Jackie likely moving on to someone wealthier and younger. George was deemed too unreliable to successfully manage a business, suggesting a downward trajectory involving late 70s cocaine use and subsequent firings.
Memorabilia Choices
Copied to clipboard!
(01:49:48)
  • Key Takeaway: The Triumph motorcycle is considered the most iconic piece of memorabilia, despite one host’s fear of motorcycles, while the blow dryer is noted as a usable prop.
  • Summary: The Triumph motorcycle was chosen as the top item for a display case, highlighting its inherent coolness despite its continuity issues. The brown leather jacket was deemed too ’thin and shiny,’ and the blow dryer was considered a more practical, usable prop.
Almost Famous Memorabilia
Copied to clipboard!
(01:51:35)
  • Key Takeaway: The Russell Hammond guitar from ‘Almost Famous’ and Lloyd Dobbler’s boombox are considered highly valuable memorabilia from Cameron Crowe’s other works.
  • Summary: The discussion pivoted to memorabilia from Crowe’s other films, with the Russell Hammond guitar being suggested as a top item. Lloyd Dobbler’s boombox was mentioned, and the host jokingly claimed to possess it, noting its enduring cultural relevance, especially with the rise of ‘courting’ narratives.
Lloyd Dobbler’s Current Life
Copied to clipboard!
(01:52:42)
  • Key Takeaway: Cameron Crowe revealed that the character Lloyd Dobbler now owns a series of Muay Thai studios in Northern California.
  • Summary: Crowe shared an update on the character, stating he owns multiple Muay Thai studios in Northern California. He noted that writing for Lloyd Dobbler remains fun, and the boombox scene was filmed by Laszlo Kovacs, who also shot ‘Shampoo’.
Best Life Lesson
Copied to clipboard!
(01:53:10)
  • Key Takeaway: The primary lesson of ‘Shampoo’ is that everyone sells out, though Jill represents a glimmer of hope by clawing her way out of that cycle.
  • Summary: The initial takeaway suggested that everyone eventually sells out, reflecting the cynical tone of the era when ‘Jaws’ changed cinema. However, Jill’s ability to make her own choices, independent of men or finances, provides a mini-lesson that optimism can triumph.
Double Feature Choices
Copied to clipboard!
(01:54:27)
  • Key Takeaway: Double feature suggestions for ‘Shampoo’ included ‘The Parallax View’ for its contrasting tone and ‘Rules of the Game’ for its thematic lineage.
  • Summary: One suggestion was ‘The Parallax View’ due to its lack of humor compared to ‘Shampoo’, noting both films were released around the same time. Another choice was ‘Rules of the Game’ because of its influence on ‘Shampoo’s’ interrelationships and wistful feeling.
Producer’s Take on Charisma
Copied to clipboard!
(01:55:27)
  • Key Takeaway: Producer Craig Horlbeck praised the film’s charisma and noted that movies from this era successfully conveyed messages while remaining enjoyable and fun.
  • Summary: The producer loved the movie, appreciating how the charisma of the major stars jumped off the screen. He noted that the film made $60 million (equivalent to $360 million today), a remarkable feat for such a small, character-based story. This contrasts with modern films where serious messages often require a depressing tone.
Celebrity Persona in Film
Copied to clipboard!
(01:57:34)
  • Key Takeaway: Warren Beatty’s casting in ‘Shampoo’ was genius because he leveraged his real-life persona as a ladies’ man to make a movie about that very character.
  • Summary: The best use of celebrity involves leveraging or slightly subverting their established brand, as Beatty did by making a film about his known persona. Denzel Washington is cited as an actor who rarely transforms but remains watchable even in lesser films. Leonardo DiCaprio is noted for maintaining mystique by avoiding constant media exposure.
Chalamet’s Career Test
Copied to clipboard!
(02:00:00)
  • Key Takeaway: Timothée Chalamet’s next original, character-based drama will be the ultimate test of whether audiences still support non-IP films based solely on star power.
  • Summary: Chalamet has the audience goodwill that Leo didn’t need 20 years ago because he actively engages in selling his movies, unlike DiCaprio’s refusal to do SNL. His upcoming non-IP film will determine if star power alone can drive audiences to original dramas today.
Cameron Crowe’s Writing Process
Copied to clipboard!
(02:04:14)
  • Key Takeaway: Cameron Crowe wrote his recent book for ‘pure joy’ on legal tablets, focusing on personal experiences and stories behind his famous journalism pieces.
  • Summary: Crowe spent years writing the book, describing it as a return to analog writing to explore his father and personal history. He noted that the most fun part of directing is seeing unexpected lines or gestures generate huge laughs from the audience, indicating strong character building.
Best Concert Experience
Copied to clipboard!
(02:08:25)
  • Key Takeaway: Cameron Crowe’s best concert was seeing The Who in San Diego, where he was crushed against the barrier while Pete Townshend insulted the venue.
  • Summary: Crowe described being slammed to the front barrier at the Sports Arena, putting him six feet from the band. During the performance, Pete Townshend called the venue a ’trash can,’ which Crowe found impressive because the band seemed to know the local context.