Decoder with Nilay Patel

Reality is losing the deepfake war

February 5, 2026

Key Takeaways Copied to clipboard!

  • The C2PA standard, intended to label content authenticity, is largely failing due to poor adoption across the ecosystem and inherent flaws that make its metadata easily stripped or ignored. 
  • Instagram's head, Adam Mosseri, publicly signaled a shift toward societal skepticism, admitting that the default assumption for photos and videos can no longer be that they are accurate captures of reality. 
  • The mixed incentives of major tech companies—who profit from distributing content while simultaneously investing heavily in AI generation—prevent them from aggressively implementing effective labeling or detection systems. 

Segments

Introduction to Reality Crisis
Copied to clipboard!
(00:01:44)
  • Key Takeaway: The current era is defined by a ‘reality crisis’ driven by the large-scale flooding of social platforms with ultra-believable fake and manipulated images and videos.
  • Summary: Nilay Patel introduces guest Jess Weatherbed to discuss labeling photos and videos to protect shared reality. The problem is exacerbated by the flood of fake, ultra-believable content on social platforms. The discussion centers on the limitations of proposed solutions like C2PA labeling standards.
C2PA Standard Explained
Copied to clipboard!
(00:03:18)
  • Key Takeaway: C2PA (Content Credentials) is a metadata standard, spearheaded by Adobe, designed to record creation and manipulation history, but it suffers from poor adoption and is easily stripped.
  • Summary: C2PA functions by embedding metadata at the point of creation (camera or software like Photoshop) detailing the file’s history. Hypothetically, online platforms would read this metadata to display authentication or AI generation status to consumers. However, even OpenAI, a steering member, admits the metadata is easily stripped, undermining its practical use.
Competitors and Adoption Gaps
Copied to clipboard!
(00:08:15)
  • Key Takeaway: While systems like Google’s Synth ID exist, the landscape is not defined by direct competition but by a lack of universal, mandatory adoption across the entire content ecosystem.
  • Summary: Google’s Synth ID is a watermarking system that operates on a different premise than C2PA’s metadata, but they could technically work together. The primary failure point is that C2PA was lauded as a universal safeguard when it was never designed for the scale of AI detection required today. Adoption is fragmented, meaning the system fails if key players are not on board.
Apple’s Stance on Standards
Copied to clipboard!
(00:11:14)
  • Key Takeaway: Apple has notably remained publicly silent and on the sidelines regarding C2PA and other content authentication standards, unlike Google which embeds C2PA in Pixel phones.
  • Summary: Apple has not officially committed to C2PA or Google’s Synth ID technology, despite being a critical player as the maker of iPhones. This hesitation might stem from Apple recognizing the inherent flaws in current solutions, preferring not to endorse a system that might ultimately fail. The dynamic lacks the financial incentive usually driving tech standards wars.
Camera Makers and Agencies
Copied to clipboard!
(00:14:32)
  • Key Takeaway: Adoption among traditional camera makers is limited to new models, failing to backdate existing hardware, and trusted photo agencies like Getty have not yet established a robust middleman verification system.
  • Summary: Many camera makers (Sony, Nikon, Leica) have joined C2PA for new models, but backdating existing cameras is technically difficult or impossible, limiting the standard’s reach. A more beneficial approach would involve trusted agencies like Shutterstock embedding metadata, but this system is not yet established across the industry.
Distribution Breakdown
Copied to clipboard!
(00:17:15)
  • Key Takeaway: The distribution side is where the labeling effort collapses because social platforms lack uniform agreement on scanning, interpreting, or preserving the metadata during upload processes.
  • Summary: Even when metadata is present, platforms must agree on scanning for specific details and adjusting upload processes, requiring total conformity which is not occurring. X (formerly Twitter), a founding member, has largely abandoned its involvement, creating a large segment of the internet that will never benefit from the system.
Creator Anger Over Labels
Copied to clipboard!
(00:27:53)
  • Key Takeaway: AI-generated labels cause significant backlash from creators who feel their work is devalued, leading to a push to remove labels entirely, even when they are intended to verify authenticity.
  • Summary: Creators become furious when content is labeled AI-generated because it implies their work is less valuable or that they took an efficiency shortcut. This dynamic makes effective communication of labels nearly impossible, as platforms struggle to define how much AI editing constitutes an ‘AI photo.’ Instagram previously tried slapping on AI labels and quickly retreated due to user backlash.
Government Bad Faith Actors
Copied to clipboard!
(00:38:36)
  • Key Takeaway: The US government, including the White House and DHS, actively uses AI-manipulated imagery, creating a war on reality that platforms are unprepared to label or counter due to conflicting business incentives.
  • Summary: The conversation shifts from good-faith actors to bad-faith actors, noting that the US government is currently using AI photos to manipulate public perception. Platforms are hesitant to label government misinformation because doing so conflicts with their profit streams derived from high-volume content distribution and AI investment.
Platform Profit Incentives
Copied to clipboard!
(00:42:09)
  • Key Takeaway: Major AI investors like Google (YouTube) and Meta (Instagram) cannot aggressively label AI content as bad without undermining the very technology they are pouring R&D profits into.
  • Summary: Companies whose revenue relies on user engagement time are incentivized to keep content flowing, even if it is low-quality ‘slop’ or AI-generated. Labeling content as AI-generated risks devaluing it, which conflicts with the platforms’ stated future reliance on AI features, such as YouTube creators using AI avatars for ads.
C2PA’s Ultimate Failure
Copied to clipboard!
(00:46:09)
  • Key Takeaway: The C2PA initiative has failed in its presented goal of creating a universal AI detection and labeling safeguard because it was repurposed from its original intent (creator proof-of-work) and cannot account for nefarious third-party models.
  • Summary: C2PA was originally meant to help creatives prove they made something, but other companies adopted it as a broad AI safeguard, which is an impossible task for the standard. A universal solution within the next five years relying on C2PA is not expected because it cannot enforce compliance among all underground or bad-faith AI providers. The next likely step involves regulatory efforts forcing compliance, as voluntary efforts have proven insufficient.